W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2004

RE: SVG 1.2 tiny

From: James Bentley <James.Bentley@guideworkstv.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 12:13:36 -0600
Message-ID: <687B7858C99ED711B87B00B0D0D1C922C0FD2B@LAMBIC>
To: www-svg@w3.org

I think the animation reasoning still holds. It is certainly easier to
accomplish some types of animation
when you don't have to animate several attributes.

-----Original Message-----
From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of
Marc Verstaen
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 12:02 PM
To: www-svg@w3.org
Subject: Re: SVG 1.2 tiny



Robin Berjon wrote:

> Keep in mind that a vast majority of SVG content is hand-authored,

Really? From what I seen presented during the last SVG Open, this is clearly
not the case. For proof of concepts, perhaps, any serious design job: I
don't think so.

Marc

Marc Verstaen
CEO Beatware Inc.,
tel:  650 556 7903
cell: 650 274 3883
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 18:17:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 23:39:55 UTC