W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: image/svg+xml;charset=""

From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:51:14 +0100
Message-ID: <41A34052.2060000@expway.fr>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Robin Berjon wrote:
>>>Because otherwise, as I wrote in the comment, content will be handled 
>>>inconsistenctly based on whether the UA supports the MIME type 
>>>directly or just via RFC3023 support. (As seen, for example, with the 
>>>W3C validator.)
>>So, enforcing a broken behaviour upon SVG to be consistent with systems 
>>that don't support SVG is a good idea? :)
> Enforcing interoperability is a good idea.

Except that that isn't interoperability, it's bug for bug comformance 
which is different. I'd take a working tool over two broken ones any day.

If you disagree, take it to the TAG because we're sure sticking to their 


> The issue of whether allowing 
> encoding information to be included in the metadata channel instead of in 
> the markup itself is a good idea or not is irrelevant; that ship sailed 
> years ago, with the publication of RFC3023.

Well a new ship's up with the updated RFC 3023 that deals with all the 
previous bugs.

> What matters at this juncture 
> is making sure that implementations of SVG and XML processors in general 
> parse SVG documents in the same way.

And the best way to achieve that is to not use charset parameters.

Robin Berjon
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2004 13:51:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:01 UTC