W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Reconsider SVG 1.2

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 18:05:47 -0000
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <cng3tr$aid$1@sea.gmane.org>


"Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> wrote in message 
news:419B829C.7080608@mit.edu...
> I'm sorry, but that doesn't seem to be true.

Sorry, you are of course right, there were support issues in earlier times 
which I guess is why I wasn't even considering it an option, but a little 
research now I believe all the current CSS UA's do support it.

I was only trying to explain why current authors don't use the CSS syntax 
rather than suggesting why these reasons might exist.

> (and in some UAs may in fact be faster...).

None that I've seen, but the difference is incredibily marginal of course 
(the extra overhead of resolving the .style. object presumably, which could 
be cached if speed was important)

Jim. 
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 18:05:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:52 UTC