W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: 15.1.2 Navigation

From: Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@streamezzo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:50:33 +0100
Message-ID: <41935209.30405@streamezzo.com>
To: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Jim Ley wrote:

>"Jean-Claude Dufourd" <jean-claude.dufourd@streamezzo.com> wrote in message 
>news:419349F1.7000008@streamezzo.com...
>  
>
>>Directional navigation by visual location only was considered and 
>>rejected, because you never know what to do in the case of e.g. tables 
>>with some merged cells, or some large object above two small ones (where 
>>would 'down' leave you then ?)
>>    
>>
>
>I agree rejecting it was the right.
>
>  
>
>>nav-up/down/left/right is not directional navigation, per se.
>>It just allows the author to define which other object should be focussed 
>>after the current one, should the virtual UP key be pressed (I say 
>>virtual, because it can be mapped to cursor key, or joystick or something 
>>else)
>>    
>>
>
>Yep, why is there no corresponding methods to next/previous on SVGDocument 
>to perform navigation via these directional ones?   I think this would be 
>useful, either by extending next/previous so that it takes an optional 
>parameter specifying a direction  e.g.  next(SVG_NAV_UP); or by new methods.
>  
>
This is an oversight, I guess.
I'll post an issue about this to the WG list.
Thanks and best regards
JC

-- 
*Jean-Claude Dufourd*
Chief Scientist, *Streamezzo*
83, Bd du Montparnasse
75 006 Paris
E-mail : jean-claude.dufourd@streamezzo.com
Tel : + 33 (0) 1 53 63 28 47
Fax : + 33 (0) 1 42 22 46 01
http://www.streamezzo.com/
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2004 11:50:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:52 UTC