W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Towards resolution of SVG 1.2 Flowing text

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 00:21:04 +0100
Message-ID: <1343615653.20041103002104@w3.org>
To: Peter Sorotokin <psorotok@adobe.com>
Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, www-svg@w3.org

On Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 12:11:12 AM, Peter wrote:

PS> At 03:05 PM 11/2/2004 -0800, Peter Sorotokin wrote:

PS> Rereading the spec the explanation above is actually out of date, as
PS> flowPara now is allowed to go inside flowRoot (this was not the case
PS> before). So, given the current state of the draft, I see your point.

The content models of the two are very different though, flowPara being
inline content and flowDiv being block content.

I recall you and Jon describing how important it was to avoid
unstructured anonymous content by not mixing block and inline together.

 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 23:21:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:47:01 UTC