- From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:23:21 +1100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Hi, Robin Berjon wrote: > > Ian Hickson wrote: > >> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Craig Northway wrote: >> >>> There was a vote as per the official W3C process. It is noted in the >>> minutes of October 21st. I don't think that suggesting there wasn't >>> a vote is suitable. >> >> >> Oh, I didn't mean it in any sort of offensive way -- it's quite >> common for groups not to have a formal vote for this kind of thing. >> For example for CSS 2.1 the decision to go to last call was something >> along the lines of a unanimous spontaneous cheer at the end of a face >> to face, not a vote. > > > FWIW we didn't have a formal vote, just a strawpoll. I'm not sure > exactly why, I think it was basically to make sure that no one's > objection had been drowned in the festive cheering, popping of > champagne bottles, and victorious cries that <flowRoot> was going to > replace XHTML and CSS for good, muahahah. Yeah, my mistake sorry. > > Oh, wait. Maybe that was meant to remain member-confidential. > > Let's get back to the rest of the comments :) I agree. Craig
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 21:23:53 UTC