W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2004

Re: Last Call of Specification Re: SVG 1.2 Comment: 4 Flowing text and graphics

From: Craig Northway <craign@cisra.canon.com.au>
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 08:24:17 +1100
Message-ID: <4187FB01.2060405@cisra.canon.com.au>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

Hi,

Ian Hickson wrote:

>On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Craig Northway wrote:
>  
>
>>>I was not involved in the vote (assuming there even was one), as I am 
>>>not a member of the SVG working group per se.
>>>      
>>>
>>There was a vote as per the official W3C process. It is noted in the 
>>minutes of October 21st. I don't think that suggesting there wasn't a 
>>vote is suitable.
>>    
>>
>
>Oh, I didn't mean it in any sort of offensive way -- it's quite common for 
>groups not to have a formal vote for this kind of thing. For example for 
>CSS 2.1 the decision to go to last call was something along the lines of a 
>unanimous spontaneous cheer at the end of a face to face, not a vote.
>  
>
Sorry, its always difficult to gather intent from emails.

>
>  
>
>>I find it difficult to believe someone could be subscribed to the SVG 
>>member confidential mailing list and not notice that SVG 1.2 Full was 
>>nearing last call.
>>    
>>
>
>I'm not subscribed to the SVG member confidential mailing list.
>  
>
I'd noticed that you have posted to it so assumed that you were subscribed.

Craig
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2004 21:24:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 5 February 2014 07:14:52 UTC