- From: Dean Jackson <dean@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 03:00:29 +1100
- To: Thomas DeWeese <Thomas.DeWeese@Kodak.com>
- Cc: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>, www-svg@w3.org
Hi Thomas, On Fri 05 Mar 2004, Thomas DeWeese wrote: > > Cameron McCormack wrote: > > >Tobias Reif: > > > >>Implementers will have a choice to embed either Emacs or Vim :) > > > > > >I vote +1 vim. ;-) > > Actually I know you were sort of joking but I was curious if it > would be acceptable to bring the 'editable' text up in a non-WYSIWYG > 'pop up' window. It seems to me that the current definition is > sufficiently 'abstract' that this would be acceptable. Still your > question of how existing text-properties are to be handled is > a good one. It was designed exactly for this to be possible. It's essential for some languages on some devices. However, I don't think we'll mandate vi just yet. I must have missed the question on existing text-properties. Dean
Received on Friday, 5 March 2004 11:00:43 UTC