W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: [svg-developers] SVG and XForms - Status Report Please

From: Kurt Cagle <kurt@kurtcagle.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 13:19:30 -0800
Message-ID: <00d401c290da$9d15b130$1524fc0a@kcagle>
To: <svg-developers@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
I'd second the call on this. Either a Note or a Working Draft on SVG/XForms integration as a separate document would help to qualify what the exact thinking is wrt XForms integration, and would make it possible to get feedback from the SVG community in terms of working implementations for similar functionality. Indeed, I wonder to a certain extent whether the XForms integration should not be handled as a separate namespace outside of the SVG namespace itself.

-- Kurt Cagle
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: AndrewWatt2001@aol.com 
  To: www-svg@w3.org ; svg-developers@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 9:00 AM
  Subject: [svg-developers] SVG and XForms - Status Report Please

  I think it would be good if the SVG WG makes public what analysis they have 
  made of the present XForms proposal and how good a fit (or not) they deem it 
  to be for modularization with SVG.

  I ask partly because there are signs in the XForms Candidate Recommendation 
  that at least some parts of the specification have been created with XHTML 
  2.0 particularly in mind. I think it is therefore important that the SVG 
  community be reassured that no decisions are being taken which makes 
  implementation of XForms with SVG unnecessarily difficult.

  This issue arises whether or not one believes that XHTML 2.0 has a future.

  Andrew Watt
  "XHTML 2.0 - the W3C leading the Web to its full potential ... to implement 
  yesterday's technology tomorrow"

        Yahoo! Groups Sponsor 

  To unsubscribe send a message to: svg-developers-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
  visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership"

  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. 
Received on Wednesday, 20 November 2002 16:20:46 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:54 UTC