Re: 1.2 feedback: printing

> >> My feeling today is that SVGP should be as close to "Static SVG
> >> Basic" as possible.
>
> NG> Yes! I want this badly. One of the common uses I have in my
> NG> day-time job is to produce static images (.gif, .png)
> NG> automatically. [...] rasterizing SVG is a much more attractive way
> NG> of doing this. [...] A static profile would be much
> NG> needed.
>
>     There already is a set of conformance criteria for static viewers.
> Which clearly explains how a static viewer should handle all SVG
> content.  What more do you want from a static 'profile'?

Nothing. Sorry for totally missing this. I thought about it a few seconds
after sending my email :-)

/niklas