W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: 1.2 feedback: printing

From: Thomas E Deweese <thomas.deweese@kodak.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 07:28:34 -0500
Message-ID: <15834.11890.575547.793250@frog.rl.kodak.com>
To: Niklas Gustavsson <niklas@protocol7.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org

>>>>> "NG" == Niklas Gustavsson <niklas@protocol7.com> writes:

>> My feeling today is that SVGP should be as close to "Static SVG
>> Basic" as possible.

NG> Yes! I want this badly. One of the common uses I have in my
NG> day-time job is to produce static images (.gif, .png)
NG> automatically. [...] rasterizing SVG is a much more attractive way
NG> of doing this. [...] A static profile would be much
NG> needed.

    There already is a set of conformance criteria for static viewers.
Which clearly explains how a static viewer should handle all SVG
content.  What more do you want from a static 'profile'?

NG> I think SVG Static might be a better name then SVG Printing since
NG> the profile sure will be used for much more then printing.

Received on Tuesday, 19 November 2002 07:28:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:54 UTC