W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Tinier SVG

From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 15:30:31 +0100
Message-ID: <11447906500.20021114153031@w3.org>
To: www-svg@w3.org, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>

On Thursday, November 14, 2002, 2:48:40 PM, Simon wrote:

SSL> chris@w3.org (Chris Lilley) writes:
>>Its an example. Simon, you are experienced enough and smart enough to
>>be able to distinguish between a spec and an implementation without
>>being prompted.

SSL> Fair enough.  It sounds like I'll need to develop my own spec to develop
SSL> an implementation, but that's hardly impossible in this constrained a
SSL> programming world.

No, my point was simpler. Citing that one implementation was 97k does
not mean 'SVG Tiny is always 97k' or 'SVGT never fits into 64k' etc.

>>Aac> Do you have information/estimates about what proportion of
>>Aac> devices ... in use or currently for sale ... are limited to 64K?
>>I would be interested to hear that, as well.

SSL> I've not yet seen any of the J2ME Personal Profile devices, but they may
SSL> be coming soon.  There are a fairly wide variety of devices which run
SSL> J2ME PP's predecessor, PersonalJava (a cut-down 1.1), but that's been
SSL> deprecated for a long time now.  There are also some interesting
SSL> examples (I believe the Zaurus

Yes; TinyLine runs on Zaurus (but in J2ME not SE).

 Chris                            mailto:chris@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 09:31:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:54 UTC