W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2002

Re: Tinier SVG

From: <AndrewWatt2001@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 05:49:47 EST
Message-ID: <b0.2f84e06a.2b04d9cb@aol.com>
To: simonstl@simonstl.com, www-svg@w3.org
In a message dated 13/11/2002 15:25:27 GMT Standard Time, 
simonstl@simonstl.com writes:

> >The zip of the classfiles is 96 kilobytes. I agree SVGT could be made
> >smaller by cutting functionality, but its a nice sweet spot in terms
> >of capabilities and seems to fit will with what the devices are
> >offering in terms of imaging devices.
> 96K is nice unless you only have 64K to work with, the basic constraint
> for J2ME MIDP work.
> Oh well.. I guess the W3C isn't likely to be interested in this, having
> already hit the sweet spot, so I'll just cook up something on my own.
> (I haven't had time for the project in the past few months, so that
> isn't a promise.)


Do you have information/estimates about what proportion of devices ... in use 
or currently for sale ... are limited to 64K?

Andrew Watt
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 05:50:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:54 UTC