W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > March 2000

Re: What is wrong with SVG?

From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@kimo.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2000 11:45:03 +0100
Message-ID: <38C4DDAF.BBDE9FCD@ls8.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
To: Jon Ferraiolo <jferraio@adobe.com>
CC: donpark@docuverse.com, xml-dev@xml.org, www-svg@w3.org, "'Arnold, Curt'" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
Jon Ferraiolo wrote:
> We didn't consider the above alternative. Instead, the two main approaches
> we looked at were the VML approach (like what SVG has now) and PGML, which
> used a "full" XML approach, such as:
>     <path>
>       <moveto x="100" y="200"/>
>       <curveto x1="133.67" y1="217.00" etc. />
> The PGML example mapped directly to convenient DOM access and mapped well
> with XSLT, but we felt the size of PGML files and the size of the PGML DOM
> were unacceptable.

It wouldn't help for the DOM size, but couldn't the XML files be
compressed by far using WAP Binary XML?

My main problem with the <path d="..."/> approach is that 
there are some path elements like arcs that have no "real" 
XML equivalent. I can use <line ... /> instead of "l", 
but there is no element for drawing arcs (AFAIK).

Best regards,


Stefan Haustein
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2000 05:45:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 March 2017 09:46:47 UTC