Jon Ferraiolo wrote: >As I remember, we decided against a syntax with coordinates as >character data because we wanted character data only for things >that were textual in nature (such as <text> elements). Now this is interesting. Do you recall WHY the WG wanted to use character data only for things that were textual in nature? I am not being critical here. I just sense a gem of wisdom I do not yet have. I am intrigued. >These comments have been made in the desire to be candid and >truthful about what is likely to happen. Would you prefer instead >that I set up expectations incorrectly, or perhaps that the >comments were left unanswered? No. I am not placing the blame on you. I am disappointed with the likely turn of events you are predicting. Your responses are appreciated still. >I do not recall any feedback comments to the first last call about >the 'path' element. I accept my share of the blame. Like everyone else, I was (and am) under an endless avalanche of specs to read. Best, Don Park - mailto:donpark@docuverse.com Docuverse - http://www.docuverse.comReceived on Tuesday, 7 March 2000 07:25:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Friday, 8 March 2013 15:54:18 GMT