"Hundiak, Arthur" wrote: > Sounds like yet another reason to break up the svg path attribute into > individual elements. Oh well, maybe for svg II. I would love to break up <path> element into sub-elements. We had to implement a parser within the parser for the <path> attributes. This shouldn't be necessary. _Is_ it to late to do something about this in SVG (I)? Another thing is that the example files I have seen, usually uses <path> excessively even when it is really only a polyline or polygon - which is rather inefficient! --jaaReceived on Monday, 13 December 1999 03:48:13 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 4 September 2006 18:11:08 GMT