- From: Tony Durham <tdurham@timeshigher1.demon.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 03 Aug 1999 18:25:51 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
I wasn't expecting my suggestion to be written into the SVG spec verbatim within 24 hours, but I thought there might at least be some response. Would anyone care to say (by private email if necessary) which of the following, in your opinion, applies: - it's way off the SVG roadmap, like 3D - cool idea but let's leave that stuff for SVG 2.0 - why would anyone want a feature like that? - it's a sexy feature but us implementers prefer a quiet life - it's unnecessary, all those things can already be done in SVG - don't understand the proposal, please explain I do think there is an issue here, because the standard must either permit recursion (in which case it should also include what is necessary to make recursion safe and efficient) or it must (sadly) forbid recursion. Is that what the rule on forward references was intended to achieve? Tony Durham Digital Editor The Times Higher Education Supplement Admiral House, 66-68 East Smithfield London E1 9XY England tel: +44 171 782 3256 mobile: 07957 870314 email: tdurham@timeshigher1.demon.co.uk http://www.thesis.co.uk
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 1999 13:29:45 UTC