- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:15:06 -0400
- To: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger@google.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Cc: Manuel Rego Casasnovas <rego@igalia.com>, Javier Fernandez <jfernandez@igalia.com>
On 10/03/2016 09:37 AM, Christian Biesinger wrote: > Hi there, > > I see that Grid is now a CR. Yay! Yay! > However, Grid has normative dependencies on Align, which is > only a WD. How does that work? Shouldn't Align also be a CR, at > least for those parts used by Grid? I think Tab answered the process question. > Semi-relatedly: > Align has sort of three components to it: > - General alignment for blocks > - Extended alignment properties for Flex > - The properties for Grid > > We (Blink) only want to implement the Grid part and probably the Flex part, for now. The working group has previously > supported this approach. However, I am not sure whether "align-content: baseline" should be considered more part of the > "applies to blocks" or "necessary for grid"? I am thinking it would be the latter (and thus not implement it for now), thoughts? I would implement and ship the subset of Align syntax that's been shipped as part of Flexbox, plus the start/end/space-evenly values. The rest of it is less stable. ~fantasai
Received on Saturday, 5 November 2016 06:15:41 UTC