- From: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:58:29 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
On 03/21/2016 06:33 PM, fantasai wrote: > Yeah, the WG resolved on adding -webkit-background-clip: text to the > fill/stroke spec as an obsolete feature. But we didn't discuss adding > the unprefixed version. If there's any ambiguity about whether unprefixed "background-clip:text" should be supported, let's please get that resolved soon, then. (If the CSSWG doesn't intend for "background-clip:text" to be valid, please provide clarification on how "-webkit-background-clip:text" would be expected to have any effect at all... and how "background-clip" / "-webkit-background-clip" should interact, since clearly they wouldn't be true aliases in that case.) (IMO, any sort of a hackaround to make this a "prefixed-alias-only" sort of feature would be too complex to be worth it, both from a spec perspective & from an implementation perspective.) ~Daniel
Received on Tuesday, 22 March 2016 01:59:02 UTC