- From: Jihye Hong <jh.hong@lge.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:02:52 +0900
- To: "'fantasai'" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>, "'Brad Kemper'" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
On 28 Feb 2016 18:29, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 02/28/2016 02:15 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: >> >> So, some ideas for the property name: > > So of all these, the ones I'm okay with are > polar-angle / polar-distance > or > offset-angle / offset-distance I prefer to maintain 'polar-' prefix for 'polar-angle' and 'polar-distance'. I want those properties to have the meaning of forming polar coordinates instead of Cartesian coordinates when an author uses them to position an element. In that point of view, 'top', 'right', 'bottom, and 'left' can't be used with 'polar-angle' and 'polar-distance' on an element. I wonder something about the CSS Logical Properties. When there is a logical property, then will the physical property which is mapped to it be maintained or dropped? A logical property should provide something that the physical property correspond to it can't do? If the physical properties are maintained as polar-angle / polar-distance, then the candidates of logical namings for them could be: - offset-polar-angle / offset-polar-distance - radial-angle / radial-distance - offset-angle / offset-distance But I think offset-angle / offset-distance is nice among them. Thanks, Jihye
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2016 08:03:26 UTC