Re: [css-sizing] min-content for replaced elements with an aspect ratio

On 01/27/2016 12:07 PM, Daniel Holbert wrote:
> On 01/27/2016 11:51 AM, Christian Biesinger wrote:
>> Oh. I hadn't actually tested it, this was based on an email
>> conversation I had with Rego... I assume Gecko would also resolve it
>> to 60px for a flexbox min-width: auto?
> 
> We should, but we don't right now (we resolve it to 100px).
> 
> Testcase for that:
>  https://jsfiddle.net/t9Laskra/1/
> 
> I believe that's because the min-width:auto spec text about "transferred
> size" has changed during the time since I resurrected Firefox's
> 'min-width:auto' implementation.  IIRC, it used to require that the
> transferred size would trump the min-content size (and make the image
> wider than its intrinsic size) -- but it no longer does.

This is filed as https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1136312
btw.  I should get to fixing that.

Received on Wednesday, 27 January 2016 20:09:25 UTC