- From: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 06:52:25 +0000
- To: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- CC: Elika Etemad <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, W3C www-style mailing list <www-style@w3.org>
Hi Gérard, > On May 5, 2015, at 4:46 AM, Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org> wrote: > > Koji, Elika, > > There are now many small but important changes between the spec > http://www.w3.org/TR/css-writing-modes-3/ > and editor's draft > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-writing-modes-3/ > > "Extent" and "measure" as abstract concepts have been dropped This specific one was resolved here[1]. There were some other resolutions, such as putting sideways-left at risk[2]. > ... but are still displayed in fig. 19 of Example 12 btw: > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-writing-modes-3/#example-30ac251e Thanks, fixed[3]. > Many changes (words, sentences, arrangements) also in section 7.3.2. I don’t remember any resolutions for this section, I suppose they’re editorial? There’s an open issue[4] though. > Are you planning an update-refresh release of the spec ? As far as I understand the process, additional "mark at risk" is not editorial and therefore we’ll need another CR. And as far as I understand, non-editorial changes after a CR should have WG resolutions associated, so you should be able to find somewhere in the minutes. [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2014Mar/0559.html [2] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Mar/0188.html [3] https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/commit/03ce64d2dc21f20ea3da60a3b5297b4524a2c71f [4] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Apr/0212.html /koji
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2015 06:52:57 UTC