Re: [selectors4] Features to Defer

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Pontus Horn af Rantzien
<pontus.horn@fintab.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 at 22:33 fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>> Prompted by plh, Tab and I just went over the Selectors 4 spec,
>> to figure out what's ready to polish up and send to CR and what
>> looks like it should stay in WD. Here's a list of what we propose
>> to keep and defer:
>
> What's the latest word on :nth-[last-]match()? Is that looking to make it to
> CR?

We dropped that a long time ago, in favor of folding the functionality
into :nth-child().  And that is on the list as something to review for
inclusion in 4 vs 5. ^_^

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 22 July 2015 16:12:40 UTC