Re: [selectors4] Features to Defer

On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 at 22:33 fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

> Prompted by plh, Tab and I just went over the Selectors 4 spec,
> to figure out what's ready to polish up and send to CR and what
> looks like it should stay in WD. Here's a list of what we propose
> to keep and defer:
>

What's the latest word on :nth-[last-]match()? Is that looking to make it
to CR?

Pontus Horn af Rantzien