- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 08:31:23 -0700
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:13 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 18 Sep 2014 20:08:25 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >>> scrollIntoView scrolls both elements and frames. So it's a bit more >>> complicated. >>> >>> Do we need to support more than "scroll everything" and "only scroll the >>> nearest scrollable thing"? >> >> >> We could probably get away with just that, but I'd be afraid of it >> being fragile to application changes; adding an "overflow:hidden" >> between the element and its scrolling container would hijack the >> scroll. We already suffer from this problem with abspos, and I'd >> rather not repeat it. > > OK. So how about: > > * "scroll everything" > * "scroll everything up to the nearest frame" > * "scroll everything up the specified element (same-document only)" > > Or don't we need the nearest frame? What do you mean by "frame" here? ~TJ
Received on Friday, 19 September 2014 15:32:13 UTC