W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2014

Re: [selectors] Assistance requested in figuring out the data model of pseudo-elements

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:59:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDQuUQfkpPuhfJCv6qO1HrAkjEA0LHh0TLge1feikDQVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: François REMY <francois.remy.dev@outlook.com>
Cc: Benjamin Poulain <benjamin@webkit.org>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 9:56 AM, François REMY
<francois.remy.dev@outlook.com> wrote:
> ± A "generator of a disjunction" makes :matches() a special syntax form, not a
> ± real pseudo-class.  That would be somewhat easier, but it would also be
> ± weird.  Dunno if I wanna go down that road.
> Also, it's not a disjunction. If it was, the following two would be equivalent:
>         a:matches(.b c, .d e)
>         a.b c, a.d e
> If I understood the situation correctly, they are not.

No, it's more complicated than that.  Let's rephrase in explicit
AND/OR terms, to make it clear how it's in DNF:

(a AND .b c) OR (a AND .d e)

It's a disjunction of conjunctions.

Received on Wednesday, 26 November 2014 18:00:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:26 UTC