- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 21:16:20 -0500
- To: Xidorn Quan <quanxunzhen@gmail.com>
- CC: kawabata taichi <kawabata.taichi@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 11/11/2014 09:01 PM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > > I don't agree with that model as well, but I don't think HTML5 model is > perfect either. Back to spanning, IMHO, it introduces much complexity > with nearly no benefits, hence I suggest that we should get rid of it. The benefit is consistency of the markup model for double-sided ruby, regardless of whether you need spanning or not. See explanation at: http://fantasai.inkedblade.net/weblog/2011/ruby/ Without it, you'd need to switch between nested ruby or <rtc> markup depending on whether that particular word in the second level required spanning or broke at the same boundary as the first level. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2014 02:16:50 UTC