W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2014

Re: [css3-ui] controlling the orientation of progress/meter/range

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 11:51:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCPiOKhMhJ-aG3QVMQYeAUrD0MwTMQhykAixSma-phUZA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
Cc: Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>, Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:09 AM
>> To: Lea Verou
>> Cc: Jonathan Kew; www-style list
>> Subject: Re: [css3-ui] controlling the orientation of progress/meter/range
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me> wrote:
>> > On Jun 26, 2014, at 19:46, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> 2. I'd avoid "circular" or any other new types unless a browser is
>> >> actually proposing to add such a display variant.
>> >
>> > FWIW, I think `circular` would be immensely useful for all three elements.
>> Why not? Implementation difficulty or is there something else I’m not
>> seeing?
>>
>> Lack of interest.  Of course, it might have no interest just because there's no
>> way to tell a progress meter to be circular, and adding this property would
>> enable that.  But still, I'd prefer to not add new things until I have some idea
>> of what they might do. ^_^
>
> We currently have a circular type for our progress bar but only when it is in a indeterminate state. I think circular would be beneficial as well and also a standardized way of doing it would be great!
>
> http://jsfiddle.net/7Dcys/1/

Ah, cool.  In that case I don't have a big problem.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 18:51:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:22 UTC