W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2014

RE: [css3-ui] controlling the orientation of progress/meter/range

From: Greg Whitworth <gwhit@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 18:44:36 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
CC: Jonathan Kew <jfkthame@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <b3b597c5707f488e9a13a5372a4aff1a@DM2PR03MB400.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:09 AM
> To: Lea Verou
> Cc: Jonathan Kew; www-style list
> Subject: Re: [css3-ui] controlling the orientation of progress/meter/range
> 
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me> wrote:
> > On Jun 26, 2014, at 19:46, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2. I'd avoid "circular" or any other new types unless a browser is
> >> actually proposing to add such a display variant.
> >
> > FWIW, I think `circular` would be immensely useful for all three elements.
> Why not? Implementation difficulty or is there something else I’m not
> seeing?
> 
> Lack of interest.  Of course, it might have no interest just because there's no
> way to tell a progress meter to be circular, and adding this property would
> enable that.  But still, I'd prefer to not add new things until I have some idea
> of what they might do. ^_^
> 
> ~TJ

We currently have a circular type for our progress bar but only when it is in a indeterminate state. I think circular would be beneficial as well and also a standardized way of doing it would be great!

http://jsfiddle.net/7Dcys/1/


Greg

Received on Thursday, 26 June 2014 18:45:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:22 UTC