W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2014

Re: [cssom-view] Specifying scroll options for scrollIntoView() without the "top" argument

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 10:28:33 +0200
To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.xjli5vknidj3kv@simons-mbp>
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 08:43:39 +0200, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 05:46:10 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr.  
> <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:
>>> On 7/22/14, 9:05 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>>> I propose we add a third overload that takes just a ScrollOptions
>>>> dict
>>>
>>> You mean just change the first overload to take an optional (has to  
>>> be; it's
>>> a dictionary) ScrollOptions dict, right?
>>
>> Yeah.
>>
>>>> If no one's implemented the current ScrollOptions overload yet
>>>
>>> Gecko has it implemented, but it hasn't shipped yet.  We can probably  
>>> change
>>> it if the changes happen soonish.
>>>
>>>> That way you either
>>>> call the function with the legacy boolean arg, or with the modern dict
>>>> arg, not both.
>>>
>>> This generally makes sense to me.
>>
>> Cool.  zcorpan, what do you think?  If you're cool with it, we can
>> pull a CfC on the list and hopefully get it approved and edited within
>> a week.
>
> Sounds OK.

Hmm, hold on. How do we retain the behavior of scrollIntoView(undefined)?

See http://www.w3.org/mid/53C04B43.6030800@mit.edu

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
Received on Saturday, 26 July 2014 08:29:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:23 UTC