Re: [cssom] Supporting JS properties whose names are CSS property names on CSSDeclaration objects

On Wed, 05 Jun 2013 02:39:20 +0200, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 04 Jun 2013 22:01:16 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  On 6/4/13 3:45 PM, Simon Pieters wrote:
>>>
>>>> I specified this since it seems like the shortest path to interop for
>>>> Gecko to implement it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Though note that this sort of thing is an anti-pattern that we really
>>> don't want to be doing in the platform, generally....  :(
>>>
>>
>> Yeah.  
>> https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/**rev/03ae20715300<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/03ae20715300>
>
>
> Until we have a better consensus on whether to spec "dashed attributes",
> I'm commenting out the proposed spec text for the time being. [1]
>
> [1] https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/965c8c7076a7

Given the new information in  
https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=290055 I suggest that  
we revert the above change.

See also https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=958887 for some  
discussion in this area.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Received on Wednesday, 15 January 2014 08:27:59 UTC