W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Seattle F2F Tue 2014-01-28 PM III: Regions

From: Leif Arne Storset <lstorset@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 17:18:06 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAi05dovZaZk=08w_9PfFCMosiV+Wv4kvkhSm0mLH4NsWTgkYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 4 February 2014 17:12, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> wrote:
> * fantasai wrote:
>>   RESOLVED: close issue 1 on regions.
>>   Noted that there was a formal objection from at least one person.
>
> Could somebody clarify what that issue is, exactly? None of the drafts I
> checked identify an issue as "issue 1". There is
>
>>   glazou: (reads earlier formulation from irc)
>>     1) Disallow flow-from on elements. (What the issue says.)
>>     2) Close the issue with no change - allow it to apply to elements
>>        and existing block pseudos, and allow it to apply to more
>>        pseudos when they get invented.
>>     3) Allow it to apply to both, but don't close this issue until there's
>>        another method to create boxes.
>>   2 3 2 2 - 2 2 2 - 2 2 2 (3) 2 2 - 2 2 1 2 - 2 2 2
>>   the twoes have it
>>   glazou: declare a consensus
>>   RESOLVED: close issue 1 on regions.
>>   Bert: formal objection
>
> It then seems the actual decision was "allow [flow-from] to apply to
> elements and existing block pseudos, and allow it to apply to more
> pseudos when they get invented." Is that what Bert formally objects to,
> assuming he is the one registering the objection?

Yes, issue 16858 was closed with no change:

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16858

-Leif
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 16:19:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 4 February 2014 16:19:03 UTC