W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2014

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Seattle F2F Tue 2014-01-28 PM III: Regions

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 17:12:04 +0100
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <bk32f9tou22g4dibse9g1e2og9ud9k9mfv@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>
* fantasai wrote:
>   RESOLVED: close issue 1 on regions.
>   Noted that there was a formal objection from at least one person.

Could somebody clarify what that issue is, exactly? None of the drafts I
checked identify an issue as "issue 1". There is

>   glazou: (reads earlier formulation from irc)
>     1) Disallow flow-from on elements. (What the issue says.)
>     2) Close the issue with no change - allow it to apply to elements
>        and existing block pseudos, and allow it to apply to more
>        pseudos when they get invented.
>     3) Allow it to apply to both, but don't close this issue until there's
>        another method to create boxes.
>   2 3 2 2 - 2 2 2 - 2 2 2 (3) 2 2 - 2 2 1 2 - 2 2 2
>   the twoes have it
>   glazou: declare a consensus
>   RESOLVED: close issue 1 on regions.
>   Bert: formal objection

It then seems the actual decision was "allow [flow-from] to apply to
elements and existing block pseudos, and allow it to apply to more
pseudos when they get invented." Is that what Bert formally objects to,
assuming he is the one registering the objection?
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Am Badedeich 7 · Telefon: +49(0)160/4415681 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
25899 Dagebüll · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Tuesday, 4 February 2014 16:12:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 4 February 2014 16:12:37 UTC