- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 13:52:31 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Oct 9, 2013, at 8:19 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:09 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Right now we have three properties: >> clip-path >> clip-rule >> clip >> >> The weird thing is that 'clip' is not a shorthand for the other two. >> This is mainly due to the legacy weirdness that 'clip' only applies >> to abspos elements. I'm wondering if we can restrict that legacy >> weirdness to just the (already weird) rect() notation, and let the >> 'clip' property be the shorthand that it looks like it ought to be? > > As Dirk said, clip-rule is completely unconnected from clip-path. > They share a name prefix, and both concern clipping in some way, but > are otherwise completely different. > > 'clip' and 'clip-path' do exactly the same thing. I thought the plan > was to just deprecate 'clip' entirely, and just use 'clip-path' for > clipping. Yes, confirmed during the meeting today. Greetings, Dirk > > ~TJ >
Received on Wednesday, 9 October 2013 20:53:01 UTC