- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 17:22:07 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 21/03/13 17:05, Christian Biesinger wrote: > At the end of the section, the spec says "A unitless zero that is not > already preceded by two flex factors must be interpreted as a flex > factor. To avoid misinterpretation or invalid declarations, authors > must specify a zero <flex-basis> component with a unit or precede it > by two flex factors." Ah thanks, I missed it. So this means that flex: 1px 1 2 is allowed but flex: 0 1 2 (where 0 is the flex basis) is not. I understand we don't have an ambiguity in the spec but honestly, that's not very nice. Can I ask why we just can't forbid unitless lengths here and make the whole thing simpler? We've always said in the past that unitless 0 length was tolerated but not encouraged. </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 16:22:36 UTC