- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 15:08:38 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 15/03/2013 14:57, Brian Kardell a écrit : > On Mar 15, 2013 9:14 AM, "Lea Verou" <lea@w3.org <mailto:lea@w3.org>> wrote: > > FWIW, I agree that :any() is a much better name than :matches(). I > > was always baffled by the WG’s decision to name it :matches, despite the > > existing implementations, straightforwardness and brevity of :any(). > > Excellent :-) I think it makes more sense in historical perspective > given the use cases they were hoping to solve and the evolution of ideas > that were being tossed around. At this point though, any or any-of > definitely seems more sensible. +1 on :any() or :any-of() instead of :matches(). -- Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 15 March 2013 14:09:07 UTC