Re: [css-selectors] Proposal: Logical Combinators / Sets

On Mar 15, 2013 9:14 AM, "Lea Verou" <lea@w3.org> wrote:
>
> FWIW, I agree that :any() is a much better name than :matches(). I was
always baffled by the WG’s decision to name it :matches, despite the
existing implementations, straightforwardness and brevity of :any().
>
Excellent  :-) I think it makes more sense in historical perspective given
the use cases they were hoping to solve and the evolution of ideas that
were being tossed around.  At this point though, any or any-of definitely
seems more sensible.