W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Exit criteria in the wake of 3 engines

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:36:36 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLa-Q7jgnfCSmvBsSBWRLGbCi9wHoQ+N3tSRMz_mWyH1_g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com>
Cc: Paul Irish <paul.irish@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Reece Dunn <msclrhd@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Who said that an implementor of the spec has to be a web browser engine?
>

Web browsers tend to have more stringent requirements than other kinds of
implementations, especially in the areas of Web compatibility, performance,
security, support for multiple platforms, and handling of dynamic
(scripted) changes.

Rob
-- 
Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur
Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl
bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat
lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir
— whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb
tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28]
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 11:37:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT