W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Telecon 2013-02-28

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:52:05 +0100
Message-ID: <51308855.6040007@exyr.org>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 01/03/2013 11:42, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
> On 01/03/13 01:28, fantasai wrote:
>
>>     <SimonSapin>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0652.html
>>     SimonSapin: z-index property is optional on page-margin boxes. Don't
>> know
>>                 why, so propose making it non-optional
>>     SimonSapin: If a UA supports it on elements, it must support it on
>>                 page-margin boxes
>>     glazou: What would be the effect on page-margin boxes?
>>     SimonSapin: If they happen to overlap, you can choose which are on top
>>                 with z-index
>>     dbaron: z-index only applies to positioned elements
>>     SimonSapin: Wording in spec that says z-index always applies
>>     dbaron: ok
>>     TabAtkins: Already applies automatically to flex items
>>     Rossen: and grid items
>>     glazou: When you flow an element into a margin box (via GCPM), does this
>>             affect that?
>>     SimonSapin: Wouldn't affect flow, only stacking
>>     glazou: Would like some time to look at this more closely
>
> Ok, I looked at it and I have no objection to the proposed change.
> It triggers the other changes discussed yesterday and depending
> on this one.

Is this a WG resolution, or should I bring it up next week?

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 10:52:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT