W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2013

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes Telecon 2013-02-28

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:42:13 +0100
Message-ID: <51308605.20501@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
CC: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>
On 01/03/13 01:28, fantasai wrote:

>    <SimonSapin>
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Feb/0652.html
>    SimonSapin: z-index property is optional on page-margin boxes. Don't
> know
>                why, so propose making it non-optional
>    SimonSapin: If a UA supports it on elements, it must support it on
>                page-margin boxes
>    glazou: What would be the effect on page-margin boxes?
>    SimonSapin: If they happen to overlap, you can choose which are on top
>                with z-index
>    dbaron: z-index only applies to positioned elements
>    SimonSapin: Wording in spec that says z-index always applies
>    dbaron: ok
>    TabAtkins: Already applies automatically to flex items
>    Rossen: and grid items
>    glazou: When you flow an element into a margin box (via GCPM), does this
>            affect that?
>    SimonSapin: Wouldn't affect flow, only stacking
>    glazou: Would like some time to look at this more closely

Ok, I looked at it and I have no objection to the proposed change.
It triggers the other changes discussed yesterday and depending
on this one.

</Daniel>
Received on Friday, 1 March 2013 10:42:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT