W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css3-multicol] updated editor's draft

From: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 11:39:21 +0200
To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Cc: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@exyr.org>, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <87fvw3riye.fsf@aeneas.oslo.osa>
Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> writes:

> Also sprach Simon Sapin:
>
>  > Le 04/06/2013 08:16, Håkon Wium Lie a écrit :
>
>  > > I'd like to get rid of the assumptions, too, but I'm unsure if the
>  > > replaced text is simple.
>  > >
>  > > Perhaps it could be expressed with something like:
>  > >
>  > >    "The/used value/  for for/column-count/  is calculated without
>  > >    regard for explicit column breaks or constrained column lengths,
>  > >    while the/actual value/  takes these into consideration."
>  > >
>  > > And then proceed with the example?
>  > 
>  > I agree: I’d really like to get rid of these assumptions, because the 
>  > current spec is just undefined when they don’t hold.
>  > 
>  > Note for editing: these assumptions are repeated twice: just before the 
>  > pseudo algorithm, and at the beginning of section 3. "The number and 
>  > width of columns".
>
> I've revised the editor's draft. Changes are in the start of section 3:
>
>   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-multicol/#the-number-and-width-of-columns
>
> and in section 3.4:
>
>   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-multicol/#pseudo-algorithm
>
> where two new examples were added and the assumption has been removed.

Too much "for":
"The used value for for ‘column-count’"

Apart from that it looks neat.

-- 
---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ----
---- Office: +47 23692400 ------ Mobile: +47 93440112 ----
------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------
Received on Thursday, 27 June 2013 09:39:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC