W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-regions] ::region() or ::fragment() pseudo-element

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:58:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDCMuQD3W2N2Hf8w5+ZvyN1CY719GD=C5ShDyrza__1duw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>
Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, W3C WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com> wrote:
> On 6/14/13 10:31 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>>Hmm.  The whole reason I took Shadow DOM
>>down the pseudo-element route was to keep the distribution selector
>>from being a "normal selector", because it's really not - there's some
>>tree-jumping going on.  But using an at-rule to break up the selectors
>>accomplishes the same thing, and looks like it might indeed be easier
>>from an authoring perspective, and better for nesting purposes.
>>
>>Okay, I guess I'm not opposed to switching back to an at-rule.
>
> One of the main reasons I changed region styling to a pseudo-element is to
> match the distribution selector. It did not make sense to me to have two
> different ways of combining a container selector with a content selector.
>
> Are you planning now on switching to an @distributed rule?

I'll finally be returning to the office tomorrow.  Give me until the
end of the week and I'll report back.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 19 June 2013 06:59:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC