W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2013

Re: [css-images] Intent to implement object-fit and object-position in Blink

From: 一丝 <yiorsi@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:16:08 +0800
Message-ID: <CA+-d5ZoX8NEP+4qgWSY2uP_-KOZzVo7Byga-ofR==CcNaOSi9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Webkit in this specification if you want to continue experiencing what is
wrong? SVG is the problem? For pictures responsive This is a useful feature.


以上
一丝


2013/6/12 Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>

> Any feedback? Apple? Microsoft? Mozilla?
>
> Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm considering implementing object-fit [1] and object-position [2] in
> > Blink, and would like to hear other vendors' opinions on supporting
> > these properties, most importantly to figure out if anyone is negative,
> > but also to learn about any plans to implement them. As far as I know,
> > these properties are currently only supported in Presto, where it's -o-
> > prefixed, and it's also using an older version (working draft or even
> > editor's draft - not sure) of the spec. The spec has reached CR by now,
> > though.
> >
> > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-images-20120417/#the-object-fit
> > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/#the-object-position
> >
> > What I've found:
> >
> > Apple: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52040 (object-fit only),
> > stuck in code review and Mac testing.
> >
> > Microsoft: No info.
> >
> > Mozilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624647 (object-fit
> > only), no progress.
>
> --
> ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ----
> ---- Office: +47 23692400 ------ Mobile: +47 93440112 ----
> ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------
>
>
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 04:16:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:12 UTC