W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Calling for a massive revamp of Paged Media and GCPM

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:08:13 +0100
Message-ID: <50F2CDDD.2090702@disruptive-innovations.com>
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 13/01/13 15:53, Simon Sapin wrote:
> Le 13/01/2013 12:46, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
>> But [Paged Media and Generated Content for Paged Media] were never
>> really implemented if you except YesLogic's PrinceXML.
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> You raise very valid points, but this part is just not true. Although
> not in web browsers, page-margin boxes from the Paged Media module have
> multiple implementations, some of which have existed for years:
>
> * YesLogic’s PrinceXML
>    http://www.princexml.com/
> * Antenna House Fromatter
>    http://www.antennahouse.com/
> * Flying saucer
>    http://code.google.com/p/flying-saucer/
> * html2pdf
>    https://code.google.com/p/html2pdf/
> * RealObjects’s PDFreactor
>    http://www.realobjects.com/products/pdfreactor/
> * WeasyPrint
>    http://weasyprint.org/

So let me correct what I said : "were never implemented by a browser".

</Daniel>
Received on Sunday, 13 January 2013 15:08:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:04 GMT