W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

Re: [cssom][css3-page] OM for margin at-rules

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:37:55 +0100
Message-ID: <512B22E3.6040608@kozea.fr>
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 25/02/2013 09:17, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
> On 24/02/13 19:21, Simon Sapin wrote:
>> Le 24/02/2013 18:24, Daniel Glazman a écrit :
>>> Sorry, I have an extra one: what's the OM for the new @page
>>> rule with the extra nested at-rules? What is the OM for the
>>> margin boxes at-rules? Without that, the whole thing is not
>>> editable easily and requires textual manipulation of stylesheets.
>>
>> (Moving to www-style.)
>>
>> We had an issue about this on Tracker for css3-page, but I think it
>> really belongs in CSSOM which already defines a CSSPageRule interface. I
>> move the bug to the CSSOM bugzilla component:
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20983
>>
>> As described there, my suggestion is to add a .cssRules attribute (that
>> would be similar to that of CSSMediaRule) in addition to the existing
>> .style attribute that contains declarations.
>
> Ok. But I would like us to make progress here. We should not release
> css3-page without having at least something in cssom for a CSSPageRule
> able to deal with what's in css3-page.

If the solution (separate cssRules and style attributes) sound good to 
you, I could propose a patch if that help.

Not preserving the relative order of inner at-rules with respect to 
declarations is okay for @page, but will it be for any future situation 
where we mix at-rules and declarations? Or should we have a single list 
of mixed at-rules and declarations?

-- 
Simon Sapin
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 08:38:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT