- From: Henrik Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:48:17 +0100
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Rik Cabanier <cabanier@gmail.com>, Jake Archibald <jaffathecake@gmail.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "robert@ocallahan.org" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "liam@w3.org" <liam@w3.org>, W3C CSS Mailing List <www-style@w3.org>
Tab Atkins Jr. skriver:> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Henrik
Andersson <henke@henke37.cjb.net> wrote:
>> Using mime types makes this a noissue.
>
> We've been over this. Other people have explained to you why mimetypes
> aren't sufficient. Please stop suggesting this unless you have a
> resolution to the problems that have been brought up. (Namely, that
> mimetypes are insufficiently granular, as a single format may exist in
> multiple versions with gradually increasing capabilities.)
>
> ~TJ
>
>
You must have missed this:
Liam R E Quin skriver:> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 16:16 +0000, Jake
Archibald wrote:
>> The proposed system would allow for, eg, format('webp-progressive'),
>> format('jpeg-smellovision').
>
> How about, format('image/jpeg', 'smellovision') ?
>
Looks solved to me.
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 20:48:51 UTC