On Friday 2013-02-01 16:27 -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 2/1/13 4:23 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: > >Separately I've received personal email from developers expressing that > >they want this to just fire the regular events. > > Sure. If I were designing/shipping this from scratch, firing the > regular events would make total sense. > > What worries me is that it'll be a source of compat problems for > those of us who have actually supported transitions/animations on > pseudo-elements for a while. And I'm frankly tired of being the > compat guinea pig for this sort of stuff on web pages that > browser-sniff all over the place... I think we should just be the compat guinea-pig on this; I tend to think it's unreasonable to have multiple event names. -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 17:40:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:06 GMT