W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2013

[css3-transitions][css3-*] rearragement of 'Animatable' lines

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2013 23:51:37 -0800
To: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <20130208075137.GA25115@crum.dbaron.org>
I've done a bit of rearraging of the "Animatable:" lines, as we
discussed at the Tucson face-to-face meeting.

First, I've made the property descriptions in the table in
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transitions/#animatable-css be in the
same format that I expect "Animatable:" lines in new modules to be
in; Animatable lines either say "no" or say "as <type>" with the
name of and a link to some type that describes the animation rules.
Most of these types are defined in the transitions spec, but some
specs will define other types (e.g., css3-transforms for
'transform', css3-fonts for 'font-stretch').

Second, I've moved everything that was not a property in either CSS
2.1 or css3-color out of that list and into other modules.  This
means I've added "Animatable" lines to all the modules that had
properties previously mentioned in that table (including in the
issue at the bottom) except for the 'crop' property, which we don't
appear have a specification for.  There are still many other modules
that need "Animatable:" lines, though.

The edits to specifications other than css3-transitions are:
css3-ui: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/0df32ea51959
css-text-decor-3: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/45007c88f5c7
css3-multicol: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/34298d3d5627
css3-fonts: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/55bbedf65a90
css3-transforms: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/csswg/rev/55d46b236cf3

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
Received on Friday, 8 February 2013 07:52:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:21:05 GMT