W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [css-masking] clip-rule

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 15:30:50 -0800
Message-ID: <52AF8D2A.6070409@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/13/2013 11:27 AM, Dirk Schulze wrote:
>
> On Dec 13, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:54 AM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 11:46 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>   7. clip-rule is not defined. At all. There's some syntax, an explanation
>>>>      of how the two values differ, and an example, but no definition
>>>>      of what the property actually *does*.
>>>
>>> I put the explanation into the example [1]. Examples are normative.
>>
>> Examples are informative.
>
> Thanks for the clarification.
>
> The definition of clip-rule is still complete. fill-rule is normatively
> referenced. It is said that UAs must follow what fill-rule does and there
> is a normative paragraph that clip-rule just applies to descendants of
> the <clipPath> element.

I can infer that 'evenodd' and 'nonzero' on 'clip-rule' are interpreted
analogously to 'fill-rule', but nothing says how it is interpreted for
clipping. Nothing says that it applies to the clipping path, for example,
as opposed to some other polygon.

You need a real definition here.

~fantasai
Received on Monday, 16 December 2013 23:31:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC