W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2013

Re: [css-break] another fragmentation question

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 17:27:13 -0800
Message-ID: <52AA6271.7060705@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 12/12/2013 05:14 PM, fantasai wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 04:03 PM, François REMY wrote:
>>
>> However, I don't think there's such kind of "prefer (1) to (2) to (3)"
>> rule, so as soon as the browser finds all the breakpoints that are
>> possible, it may use them in any priority order.
>
> Correct. There is no prioritization among the types of breaks.
> We've tried to make this a bit clearer by switching to letters
> instead of numbers. :)

Oh, and we added a note. :)

   # There is no inherent prioritization among these classes of
   # break points. However, individual break points may be
   # prioritized or de-prioritized by using the breaking controls.

~fantasai
Received on Friday, 13 December 2013 01:27:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:39:17 UTC